Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66179 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 17:20:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 17:20:30 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BmyIF-000ES9-QI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:20:44 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BmyIF-000ERk-NR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:20:43 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BmyI0-000IbE-3e for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:20:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BmyGU-0004Qc-Ur for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BmyGU-0004QT-Iz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.21]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmyGR-00031G-OO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:18:54 +0100 Received: from fwd11.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BmyGO-0005py-03; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:18:48 +0200 Received: from (E4zXeBZZgeMaYlCSN7JyERKVtPm45U45wcFK-9cth-Ugcxtt-86XZY@[217.251.191.162]) by fwd11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BmyGA-11XwkC0; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:18:34 +0200 From: jannsen <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002201c46c3d$060963a0$0201a8c0@private.network> <004b01c46cc0$0d40fce0$07d98351@rogersservices> <001e01c46dcf$34e50a60$d6537ad5@rogersservices> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:18:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1BmyGA-11XwkC0@fwd11.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: E4zXeBZZgeMaYlCSN7JyERKVtPm45U45wcFK-9cth-Ugcxtt-86XZY X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.869,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=1.574 Subject: Re: LF: Re: TX output circuit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) James Moritz schrieb: > Dear Scott, LF Group, > > To save long-winded explanations, I have drawn a circuit diagram of my > modified version of the G0MRF PA output circuit, with some details of the > output transformer. It is too big to send via the reflector, but if anyone > wants it, let me know and I will e-mail it direct. > > My unit gives 400W out with 37V supply - for 300W out with a 48V supply, I > reckon the primary windings of the output transformer should be changed from > 4 to 6 turns. The value of the choke in the DC supply is not critical - the > iron dust cores can often be found in old PC SMPSUs. The most significant > change to the original circuit was to remove the decoupling capacitor from > the centre tap of the transformer primary, and increase the inductance of > the choke, converting the circuit into a "current feed" class D > configuration. This means the DC supply has a high impedance at 137kHz, > which prevents high transient currents into the low pass filter capacitors > when the MOSFETs switch. The ideal drain voltage waveform would be a half > sine wave, allthough in practice there is still considerable ringing at the > switching transitions, allthough much reduced. The value of the damping > resistors and capacitors is a compromise; reducing R and increasing C > reduces the amount of HF ringing, but increases dissipation in the resistors. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > > Hi Jim, pse send the diagram direct: dj8wx@qsl.net or 0482183881-0001@t-online.de tks in advance Uwe/dj8wx