Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60609 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 15:10:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 15:10:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 82671 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 15:10:40 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 15:10:32 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BYnfs-000KkU-0W for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:10:32 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnfX-0007iU-4c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:11 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnfW-0007iL-O0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:10 +0100 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BYuE2-0000t3-82 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:10:14 +0100 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.x.x) with ESMTP id i5BFA3bp022735 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:10:04 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) X-Fake-Domain: noname.nodomain.nowhere Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host196.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.196]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id i5BF3iwF012037 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:04:08 +0700 (OSS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA00284 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:16:49 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:16:48 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <40C9C28E.9070302@usa.net> X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (noname.nodomain.nowhere) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically" Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi, Alberto On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Alberto di Bene wrote: > > Why do I smell a strong scent of EH-antenna ??? Poor Maxwell is > turning in his grave... It seems funy EH-"antenna" realy works. But surface curent of a coax realy radiate, not "antenna" itself :-) Certanly it is not better then siple pice of wire :-) All "theorys" about "crossed fields" is a nonsence of cose... 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb