Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46282 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 21:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 21:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 3032 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 21:35:58 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 21:35:57 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BYAjk-0000Ze-Uw for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:35:57 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYAix-00087L-H9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 22:35:07 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYAiw-00087C-Sb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 22:35:06 +0100 Received: from virus-out.ttyl.com ([193.212.240.200] helo=virus-out-st.online.no) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BYHHS-0004Ny-OL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 05:35:10 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: tns-fbu-22-208.corp.telenor.no Received: from tns-fbu-22-208.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.90] [134.47.162.90]) by scan.telenor.net with ESMTP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:26 +0200 X-Fake-Domain: tns-fbu-22-212.corp.telenor.no Received: from tns-fbu-22-212.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.91]) by tns-fbu-22-208.corp.telenor.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:26 +0200 X-Fake-Domain: TNS-FBU-2E-006.corp.telenor.no Received: from TNS-FBU-2E-006.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.86]) by tns-fbu-22-212.corp.telenor.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:26 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:34:26 +0200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (TNS-FBU-2E-006.corp.telenor.no) Message-Id: Thread-Topic: RE: G3ldo's noise Thread-Index: AcROPQDfyP20dU6wR9yQBl5WYwjfaQALGoFQ From: jan-martin.noding@telenor.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2004 21:34:26.0471 (UTC) FILETIME=[89DCFB70:01C44E69] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_40_50=0.474,HTML_FONT_BIG=0.1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY=0.544,NO_REAL_NAME=0.285 Subject: LF: RE: RE: G3ldo's noise (Internasjonal) Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

if it is unbalanced type signal

---
J M Nøding, Datakvalitet, TTS, Kristiansand
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Alberto di Bene
Sent: 9. juni 2004 18:13
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: RE: G3ldo's noise

jan-martin.noding@telenor.com wrote:

A bifilar wound choke passes the balanced signal, but attenuates the unbalanced. Propose to wind a 2x 1mH choke (possibly much less)

Wouldn't this play havoc with ADSL ?

73 Alberto I2PHD