Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56730 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 14:38:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 14:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 96614 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 14:38:30 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 14:38:19 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BYnAh-000OHq-B2 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:38:19 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnAK-0006en-B6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:37:56 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnAJ-0006ee-U8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:37:55 +0100 Received: from one.surfree.co.uk ([195.80.0.234]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BYtip-0000pO-MH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:37:59 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: standalone Received: from standalone ([212.248.140.28]) by one.surfree.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA01890 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:36:15 +0100 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:35:36 +0100 Message-ID: <01C44FC9.BDED41C0.actalbot@southsurf.com> From: Andy To: "'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org'" Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:35:34 +0100 Importance: high X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Organization: UKNWN(UK) X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,X_PRIORITY_HIGH=0.516 Subject: RE: LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 I hope his claims are backed up by serious properly calibrated range measurements - not just an "I worked Chile on 14MHz so it must be good" (or Scotland on 80m etc) Andy G4JNT -----Original Message----- From: Alberto di Bene [SMTP:dibene@usa.net] Sent: 2004/06/11 15:33 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: "Revolutionary antenna technology reduces size dramatically" Another link is : http://www.eetimes.com/at/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=21401977 Why do I smell a strong scent of EH-antenna ??? Poor Maxwell is turning in his grave... 73 Alberto I2PHD ----------------------------------------- Fabian Kurz wrote: >http://www.uri.edu/news/releases/?id=2659 > >http://slashdot.org/articles/04/06/11/1222215.shtml?tid=126 > >http://www.scienceblog.com/community/article2865.html > > > > >