Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43545 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 15:00:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 15:00:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 38704 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 15:00:47 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 15:00:27 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BYnW7-0008hO-2I for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:00:27 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnVh-0007PO-VY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:00:01 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BYnVh-0007PF-GN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:00:01 +0100 Received: from mta10-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.94]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BYu4D-0000rX-AM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:00:05 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: captbrian Received: from captbrian ([80.1.84.118]) by mta10-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040611145854.IXXI13246.mta10-svc.ntlworld.com@captbrian> for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:58:54 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (captbrian) Message-ID: <000801c44fc4$e9e80da0$2abc0150@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000f01c440f6$a02db8e0$91360751@y6m8a2><000001c44f35$29d82a70$8f208351@DerekAtter> <0Y3oqhAHnWyAFwsj@telemetry.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:26:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.68,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=2.25,TW_CQ=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CQs on 136 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Could it be all at the same time ? say 1000 Sunday? I'll monitor while working on TX. Need incoming sigs to improve ant. Bryan G3GVB Brighton area ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Boucher To: Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 9:13 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: CQs on 136 > Sorry John, I've been concentrating on HF CW just lately but will make a > determined attempt to get on 136 CW today (Friday) and Sunday. > > 73, Tom G3OLB > > In message <000001c44f35$29d82a70$8f208351@DerekAtter>, Derek Atter > writes > > John, > > > > Don't despair! You are putting out a good signal into this neck of > > the woods with your new system -I have been hearing you regularly . > > My antenna system is down at the moment due to other activities but > > I hope to join you operating hand sent CW again ere long!! > > > > 73, de Derek Atter G3GRO , Crawley West Sussex > >> From: Frederick John Armstrong > >> To: lf group > >> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:48 PM > >> Subject: LF: CQs on 136 > > > >> Hello again folks. > >> > >> I have been sending copious cqs during the week and especially > >> today, Sunday, morning. No reports of being heard so I wonder > >> did anyone out there hear my signals I wonder? > >> > >> I have made improvements to my antenna since I had contacts with > >> Jim M0BMU and Tom, G3OLB last weekend and thanks to you both for > >> the encouraging reports. > >> > >> Since then I have put a second wire on the horizontal part to > >> increase the capacitance ans it made quite a difference to the > >> loading coil turns to achieve resonance with an increase in > >> antenna current. I have also increased the height of the top > >> wires to 50 ft so I did think I would be getting somewhere. > >> Maybe you were all outside enjoyong the sun and who could blame > >> you? > >> > >> Will be continuing with the calls as and when I can so if you > >> hear me would you please report to me? > >> > >> Thanks and 73 from John, G3JRL, Weymouth. > > >