Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11090 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 18:14:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 26 May 2004 18:14:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 82657 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 18:14:18 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 26 May 2004 18:14:09 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BT2un-000KSe-NH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:14:09 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BT2tT-0002pr-5e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:12:47 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BT2tR-0002pi-8M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:12:45 +0100 Received: from outbound05.telus.net ([199.185.220.224] helo=priv-edtnes42.telusplanet.net) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BT9Rq-0004QU-Hf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 02:12:42 +0100 Received: from localhost ([199.185.220.240]) by priv-edtnes42.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP id <20040526181227.TIL1854.priv-edtnes42.telusplanet.net@localhost> for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 12:12:27 -0600 Received: from 204.174.12.17 ( [204.174.12.17]) as user sthed475@192.168.200.1 by webmail.telus.net with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2004 11:12:27 -0700 Message-ID: <1085595147.40b4de0b1a742@webmail.telus.net> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 11:12:27 -0700 From: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53.cd0d8a2.2de5e9f7@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <53.cd0d8a2.2de5e9f7@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1-cvs X-Originating-IP: 204.174.12.17 X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.869,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=1.052 Subject: Re: LF: G0MRF-TX-ouput circuit troubles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 David I have been examiming your drive cct from the FET driver to the gate of the FETs. In this cct you have a cap., a diode with the anode to common this node connects to a 10ohm resistor in series with the gate that has the gate side tacked to common via a 4.7k resistor. Am I correct in assuming that the purpose of the cap is to prevent DC voltages from getting to the gates of the FETs in the case of an exciter failure? Is the 4.7K just there to keep undue charge off the gate capacitance? Also, what is the design intent of the 'fast' diode you have installed. I am also curious as to what the waveform will look like out of this driver circuit. Is it a 12V p-p from common to 12V or is it something else. Thanks for any insight you can offer. Regards, Scott, VE7TIL Quoting G0MRF@aol.com: > In a message dated 25/05/2004 22:01:42 Central Europe Standard Time, > knaap159@zonnet.nl writes: > > > Maybe somebody has something to say about this...... > > > I think you're spending too much time measuring things at frequencies that > > are not LF. It's a great analysis of the detail, but I can't help thinking > you > are overlooking an obvious fault. > BTW. What is the output power? The supply Voltage? and the efficiency? > Just concentrate on the basics. The circuit works, but if you start removing > > diodes adding resistors etc, then there's not much anyone can do to help as > > you are now developing your own circuit and not trying to duplicate mine. > Build the circuit as close to the original as you can. > Check you have the correct waveforms at the gates. (keep wire lengths short. > > This maybe 136kHz, but the waveform rise and fall time neeed to be fast. > Around the HEF4013, FET driver and FETs, the construction should be > consistent > with good VHF practice ) > Measure the 136kHz output power, the supply voltage and calculate > efficiency. > Then you'll have a benchmark of performance. If you have less than 200W > output from a 36V supply or an efficiency less than 60% then you have a fault > in > a component or in the construction that you need to find. > After you have a reasonable benchmark, change one thing at a time and > compare. If you have an improvement, leave it in circuit. If you don't, then > put it > back as before and try something else. Jim's work on the transformer is > excellent and I'm now comparing my original transformer with a version of > Jim's > built on a 3C90 42mm core as supplied in the kit. > I've built versions of this circuit from 400W at 73k to 700W (4 FETs) at > 136kHz. There's even a version running in the Medium waveband around > 1200kHz. > Good luck > David G0MRF >