Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66065 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 06:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 10 May 2004 06:29:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 47151 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 06:29:18 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 10 May 2004 06:29:17 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BN4Hr-000C8p-Cd for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 May 2004 06:29:15 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BN4H9-0002iO-2K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 07:28:31 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BN4H8-0002iF-Hp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 07:28:30 +0100 Received: from mail1.finet.se ([81.216.34.102]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BNApX-0007hE-Hl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:28:27 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: SM5EUFUrban Received: from SM5EUFUrban (snf2-53.finet.se [81.216.52.53]) by mail1.finet.se (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4A6SPHM024391 for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 08:28:25 +0200 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (SM5EUFUrban) Message-ID: <004501c43658$2d94b980$3534d851@SM5EUFUrban> From: "urban ekholm" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001701c43602$1b335540$2102000a@ibm> Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 08:29:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=1.052 Subject: LF: Re: TX-ouput transformer problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Hi all ! I made some tests on a TV line output core during the last winter, just to see if is suitable for an antenna matching transformer. Maybe this can be of some help: I used a core from an old coulour TV (22"-screen). The core was first taken apart and the thin pvc pieces giving a small air gap were removed and the cores were glued together with epoxy. On each leg (the ones whitch are circular) I wound 25 turns of 1mm wire (with electricians tape between the core and the first turns) which gave an inductance of about 330uH. This was connected between the tx and a Heathkit "Cantenna" dummy load with an SWR-meter between the tx and the transformer. The output was changed by changing the voltage on the PA. The SWR was very high, obviously too loose coupling between the windings (or wrong ferrite !) I then removed one winding and instead rewound it on top of the other (the same number of turns). Making the same test again and now the SWR was 1:1 ! Running 200W output for a couple of minutes gave no heating at all of neither the core nor the winding. The power output was increased to 350W and after about 10min a slight heating of the core was noticeable. With 470W output the temperature increases quicker and maybe using QRSS with longer transmissions will give problems. The last test was with 750W output. Still SWR 1:1 but the core temperature rises more quickly now and I did not test this fore a long time. The winding also now started to get warm Probably it would be possible to use 750W by using two cores "side by side" and thicker wire. However, I did not have enough thicker wire to perform this test. Good luck ! 73 SM5EUF / Urban ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick" To: Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:02 PM Subject: LF: TX-ouput transformer problems > Hello all, > > I completed my G0MRF-transmitter, and today I've done the > first tests on it. > All is working fine, except the output circuit. > > As far as I can see now, the outputt-transformer on the FET's is > not good. > > I'm using an old core from the HV-circuit of a computer monitor. > I got this tip from Jim, M0BMU a while ago. > Core size is about 63x39x14mm (2 "C"shaped halves, held together > with a metal spring clip) > I payed a lot off atention to have no air gap. > > Used 10 turns on the primary side, centre tapped. > (That means 2 times 5 turns.......) > Secundairy coil max. 21 turns with taps, all as described in the > original design. > Well, at 15V drain voltage I already had 9Amp........ > With 40V over 50 Ohm....... > FET's got hot........ > I changed primairy to 2 times 7 turns instead of 2 times 5 turns, > and that gave me 15V, 5Amp with also around 40V over 50 Ohm. > So, higher efficiency...... > > I wonder if anyone has experience with these core's and have hints about > number of turns to be used, before I start to get into endless rewinding > coils etc. > > 73 > > Dick, pa4vhf > > > >