Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82076 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 07:19:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 07:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 98284 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 07:19:19 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 07:19:18 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BDeg1-000PKy-TT for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:19:18 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BDefZ-0004OO-7M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:18:49 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BDefY-0004OF-Qv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:18:48 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86] helo=anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDefV-0000Dh-SD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:18:45 +0100 Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-37.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BDefV-0004zY-0b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:18:45 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:17:54 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Tom Boucher References: <003b01c421a0$e0031980$a5567ad5@rogersservices> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: 1W ERP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit I'm still waiting for 'KEV's design for a 1W ERP dummy load! In message , WE0H writes >Well now that we are comparing apples to oranges even though they are the >same size and weight (power) I think a vertical loop (series resonated & >transformer coupled of course) would radiate the 1w ERP better than Mal's >big vertical. Hi hi... > >73's, > >Mike >WE0H >WD2XGI >http://www.we0h.us/lf > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] >On Behalf Of James Moritz >Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:47 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: Re: 1W ERP > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: hamilton mal > >> In theory 1w erp from a match stick is the same as the same power from a >> large array but in reality there is a difference >> My choice is 1w erp from a big vertical. >> G3KEV > >Dear Mal, LF Group, > >Is that the same as a ton of sand being much heavier than a ton of feathers? > >Cheers, Jim Moritz >73 de M0BMU