Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35123 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 11:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 11:02:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 37628 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 11:02:53 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 11:02:44 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BDiAG-0009K4-Mt for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:02:44 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BDi9g-0007LX-9m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:02:08 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BDi9f-0007LO-Qf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:02:07 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: ms.genesiswireless.us Received: from ms.genesiswireless.us ([63.171.43.8] helo=ms.genesis-technology.com) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDi9c-0000Ys-EY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:02:04 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: we0h Received: from we0h (rev-65.165.20.192.genesiswireless.us [65.165.20.192]) by ms.genesis-technology.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id i3EB1SlZ032135 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:01:29 -0500 From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:04:36 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: RE: LF: RE: Re: 1W ERP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Would that be like a resistor loaded vertical? Oh well... 73's, Mike WE0H WD2XGI -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Tom Boucher Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:18 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: 1W ERP I'm still waiting for 'KEV's design for a 1W ERP dummy load! In message , WE0H writes >Well now that we are comparing apples to oranges even though they are the >same size and weight (power) I think a vertical loop (series resonated & >transformer coupled of course) would radiate the 1w ERP better than Mal's >big vertical. Hi hi... > >73's, > >Mike >WE0H >WD2XGI >http://www.we0h.us/lf > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] >On Behalf Of James Moritz >Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:47 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: Re: 1W ERP > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: hamilton mal > >> In theory 1w erp from a match stick is the same as the same power from a >> large array but in reality there is a difference >> My choice is 1w erp from a big vertical. >> G3KEV > >Dear Mal, LF Group, > >Is that the same as a ton of sand being much heavier than a ton of feathers? > >Cheers, Jim Moritz >73 de M0BMU