Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37076 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 23:48:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 23:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14959 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 23:48:54 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 23:48:49 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BDXe5-0003gA-JV for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:48:49 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BDXdW-0008Pe-VX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:48:14 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BDXdW-0008PV-II for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:48:14 +0100 Received: from ms.genesiswireless.us ([63.171.43.8] helo=ms.genesis-technology.com) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDXdS-00080J-3R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:48:10 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: we0h Received: from we0h (rev-65.165.20.192.genesiswireless.us [65.165.20.192]) by ms.genesis-technology.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id i3DNlblZ020575 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:47:37 -0500 From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:50:50 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003b01c421a0$e0031980$a5567ad5@rogersservices> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: LF: RE: Re: 1W ERP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Well now that we are comparing apples to oranges even though they are the same size and weight (power) I think a vertical loop (series resonated & transformer coupled of course) would radiate the 1w ERP better than Mal's big vertical. Hi hi... 73's, Mike WE0H WD2XGI http://www.we0h.us/lf -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of James Moritz Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:47 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: 1W ERP ----- Original Message ----- From: hamilton mal > In theory 1w erp from a match stick is the same as the same power from a > large array but in reality there is a difference > My choice is 1w erp from a big vertical. > G3KEV Dear Mal, LF Group, Is that the same as a ton of sand being much heavier than a ton of feathers? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU