Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50201 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2004 13:06:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 13:06:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 31872 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2004 13:06:39 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Priority: 3 X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 13:06:37 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AyW57-00083T-CR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:06:37 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AyW4O-0001W5-Ko for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:05:52 +0000 Received: from [195.37.42.5] (helo=rzlsrv1.fh-amberg-weiden.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AyW4O-0001Vv-1L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:05:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rzlsrv1.fh-amberg-weiden.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id BFC49213037 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:04:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from rzlsrv1.fh-amberg-weiden.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rzlsrv1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26453-01 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:04:30 +0100 (CET) X-Fake-Domain: fh-amberg-weiden.de Received: from fh-amberg-weiden.de (kp.fh-amberg-weiden.de [10.10.130.30]) by rzlsrv1.fh-amberg-weiden.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 5C02B212FEE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:04:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4045D7DD.3060401@fh-amberg-weiden.de> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:04:29 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_K=F6lpin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-DE; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: de-de, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4045A561.8090003@fh-amberg-weiden.de> <17360513086.20040303140639@dx.ru> In-reply-to: <17360513086.20040303140639@dx.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fh-amberg-weiden.de Subject: Re: LF: Re: 3rd Rus LF Expedition Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hello Ed, I think that most of the European LF-DXers will agree: you should not use 137.700 for your transmissions! It will hardly be possible to keep this frequency clear from inter-european short range traffic during your trip - sorry to say that. Vy 73 Tom, DK1IS Ed Lesnichy schrieb: >Dear LF-enthusiasts! > >Wednesday, March 3, 2004 DK1IS wrote: > >TK> preparing for your DXpedition to the Far East: > >TK> Do you know about any LF stations (radio, NDB, time signal) on the way >TK> to Vladivostok which could serve as propagation indicators for the >TK> Europeans? > >SRI... but I yet do not know any LF's stations in Vladivostok's area. >Now has set such question to Mike UA0MF in Vladivostok - QRX pse... >The nearest LF broadcasting stations are absent. > >I also have difficulties to define ONE TX freq during all period of >expedition - there are variants 137.600, 137.700, abt 137.773 or >137.7895 (near ZL6QH beacon's freq 137.7890/137.7886 at March 19-20). > >What is the best RX freq for all(Eu, ZLs, Noth America, As) simultaneously >for reception UA0LE ? > >73! Ed RU6LA ed@dx.ru http://136.73.ru > > > > >