Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81701 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2004 00:17:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2004 00:17:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 39263 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2004 00:17:31 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2004 00:17:30 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Atbsg-000A4m-0H for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:17:30 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Atbrp-0005nc-Is for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:16:37 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.111] (helo=gadolinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Atbro-0005nT-VR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:16:37 +0000 Received: from [213.122.24.90] (helo=Main) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #25) id 1Atbro-0003g3-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:16:36 +0000 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (Main) Message-ID: <002001c3f67d$a7795f00$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:10:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: RF Current meter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Hi Gary you will just get more volts out of it at higher curent......if that drives the meter off-scale reduce the number of secondary turns, or use a potential divider to reduce the voltage. RF Thermo ammeters can be shunted, but my experiments so far suggest that the scale does not quite "scale"...even taking care to use a "four terminal" connection to avoid contact resistances......I'm still working on that one. I dont think it was you testng this afternoon unless you now have a 1000ft tower and 10kW :-)) Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "G4WGT - Gary" To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group" Sent: 18 February 2004 20:01 Subject: LF: RF Current meter > Hi all at LF, > > I have been conducting tests with QRS & DFCW now that I have completed the > DDS VFO & the antenna is back up after storm damage & everything seems to be > ok. > > The main reason for this e-mail is to ask this question, > > "When I have looked at designs in amateur radio magazines or internet for a > clip on RF Ammeter the designs seem to be limited to 2 ranges (100mA & 1A > FSD), is there a limit to the range of this type RF Ammeter or can the > ranges be extented to say 5 Amps maybe? is there a calculation to extend the > range ?" > > My LF antenna seems to be showing in excess of one Amp so I need an RF > Ammeter with a greater range than 1A. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT > >