Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6091 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 15:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 15:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 35242 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 15:09:12 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 15:09:10 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Awjby-00092P-CE for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:09:10 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AwjbB-0006d8-1X for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:21 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.176] (helo=protactinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Awjb7-0006cz-Ci for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:18 +0000 Received: from [213.122.63.81] (helo=Main) by protactinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #25) id 1Awjb5-0002zf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:15 +0000 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (Main) Message-ID: <000401c3fd43$8b7f0760$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8840D182F8BB7540B173D2B1FA0CA9AB018AE3C5@argos.clb.tcfr.thales> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:08:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: Propagation...reply Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Hi again Jean-Louis...a very good question !! I am not sure I know the answer, but it sure is not a "skip zone" I dont think there should be any of these on LF. My crude geometry suggests that about 2000kms is the distance for a single night-time "hop" ("reflection" height about 90-100kms) ....this means that Uwe is 2 hops and Sam is 3 hops. I think as conditions are not too bad at the moment that there may be interference between paths of different numbers of "hops". It is possible that Sam is getting constructive interference whilst Uwe is seeing destructive interference. Steve Dove W3EEE has a real-time plot of DCF39 and he shows very deep fading nulls. The peak levels which were good were only maintained for a few minutes. It may also be the case that Uwe's noise levels are quite high. He has the Sylt Loran-C chain and various utility high power stations to contend with. I have often seen difference in reception across the width of the UK but nothing as dramatic as these reports. Joe is transmitting on 137.777kHz using around 20sec dot QRSS. He uses a keyer clocked by a free running 555 rather than a computer driven system hence the "odd" (and sometimes different) value Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 27 February 2004 13:59 Subject: RE: LF: Propagation > > Hi Alan and group, > > the propagation for 6600km distance was good, but for 4300km, > > the distance > > between Joes and my QTH, was not. all nights I have had VO1NA > > on the screen. > > last night: nothing. > > > > regards > > Uwe/dj8wx > > > > And now, ladies and gentlemen, a newbie question: could this be explained by > a propagation phenomenon (silent zone between 2 hops ??) or rather by an > important noise floor at Uwe QTH ? > > (Another newbie question: please what is (again !) the xmitting frequency of > VO1NA ?) > > 73 de Jean-Louis F6AGR > Loc JN18DQ >