Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5819 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 12:01:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 12:01:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 27634 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 12:01:07 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 12:01:03 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AjdWB-0006qR-8H for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:01:03 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AjdVY-0006Uq-Qh for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:00:24 +0000 Received: from [134.153.232.16] (helo=cupids.ucs.mun.ca) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AjdVX-0006Uh-OS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:00:23 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (root@plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.151]) by cupids.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0MC0IFZ041446 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:30:19 -0330 (NST) (envelope-from jcraig@morgan.ucs.mun.ca) Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (jcraig@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plato.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0MC0Igj026989 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:30:18 -0330 (NST) Received: (from jcraig@localhost) by plato.ucs.mun.ca (8.12.3p2/8.12.1/Submit) id i0MC0HVZ027117; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:30:17 -0330 (NST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:30:17 -0330 (NST) From: "Joe Craig" X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-reply-to: <005601c3e06a$cddd6660$050c8751@rogersservices> Message-ID: References: <001301c3de7a$dade8b60$fe79a8c0@PCVONWALTER> <4010040925.20040119114525@dx.ru> <005601c3e06a$cddd6660$050c8751@rogersservices> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: V01NA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 Hello Jim and group, Thanks for the capture, Jim. I'm pleasantly surprised by this very good reception with only one of the 100m wires of the aerial; the amount of inductance required for resonance only increased slightly (~10%) over the 2 wire system and I was almost convinced that it was tuned to a 'false' resonance. The TX was off this morning, but will be on again tonight/tomorrow morning. Cheers Joe On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, James Moritz wrote: > Dear Joe, LF group, > > Broken antenna wires notwithstanding, got quite good copy of VO1NA last > night considering the relatively high level of QRN here. As usual, best > reception was around dawn - see attachment. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU >