Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21705 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 17:52:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan02.plus.net) (212.159.14.236) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 17:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 42664 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 17:52:38 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore02.plus.net (212.159.14.216) by ptb-mxscan02.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 17:52:37 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AgpC1-000AzP-Eu for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:52:37 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AgpBc-0000eH-BR for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:52:12 +0000 Received: from [213.46.243.26] (helo=amsfep16-int.chello.nl) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AgpBb-0000e1-Tc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:52:11 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: Peter Received: from Peter ([24.132.154.248]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with SMTP id <20040114175141.MEBQ13071.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@Peter> for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:51:41 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (Peter) Message-ID: <014d01c3dac6$cd3aabe0$f89a8418@Peter> From: "Peter van Daalen" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:49:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: lf andnoise and offshore. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 Sorry, I made a most ennoying typo : I wrote : snip..... " Does sea again ( if any at all ? ) and low man made and evironment noise add substantially to the LF performance ? " snip..... While I meant to write : " Does seagain ( if any at all ? ) and etc... add substantially to LF performance ? " I do know something on sea gain on 144 Mhz ( for /MM EME purpose on moonrise and moonset ) but I am unaware of the seagain effects on LF.