Return-Path: Received: (qmail 52480 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 12:22:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 12:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 37187 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 12:22:57 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 12:22:56 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AiYQi-0009YW-4K for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:22:56 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AiYQe-0001AD-5L for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:22:52 +0000 Received: from [212.77.101.160] (helo=smtp.wp.pl) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AiYQd-00019Z-IF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:22:51 +0000 Received: (WP-SMTPD 10049 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 13:21:19 +0100 Received: from br198.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO SQ5BPMATHLON) (sq5bpm@[80.53.201.198]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (wp-smtpd) with SMTP for ; 19 Jan 2004 13:21:19 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (SQ5BPMATHLON) Message-ID: <000501c3de86$be5e4960$6400a8c0@SQ5BPMATHLON> From: "Marek SQ5BPM" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:21:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Antivirus: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-ChangeAV: 0 X-WP-AntySpam-Rezultat: NIE-SPAM Subject: Re: LF: Marek and others Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 > Hallo to you, > saw Marek yesterday mostly O, sometimes M. > Several calls, but no response. Sorry Walter, I didn't have a single trace of your signal in Argo. Maybe next time I will have the receiving loop ready, which hopefully will improve the RX on my side: even though I hardly tried, I couldn't hear RU6LWZ on CW (sorry Ed). SP5ZCC in principle is not the best place for low bands due to QRMs - we are in the middle of an 18000 city and Warsaw is just a few kilometers away. It gets only worse as the time passes... > So with RU6LA, who > was stronger than Marek. Had QSO with Teo, > YU7AR, was audible most time with 25uV/50ohms, > ufb. YU7AR is usually audible here also (not yesterday though), I wonder if he can _hear_ our signal? Just BTW: Is there a simple common way to send the expression "audible" as an addition to the report during the QSO? I didn't find any info... If both stations send it, it would be a good opportunity to try CW. Sending the word "audible" is long and not practical. Something like four dashes instead of O would do, but... :-) Any ideas? Maybe "O!" ? Exclamation mark is not an international CW character and does not work in QRSS (even as a comma). So maybe a full-stop: "O." ? Or "O" followed by a number indicating the audible strength? Or just "O" and then "Sx" where x is a number? It would really make things easier! Talking via the Internet is not the way I like. Sorry if discussion alike has already happened on the reflector. > The 137.xx is a crazy band. For me it seems to be the > best way with a lot of work not to make a QSO, hi. Hard not to agree... > 73 Walter DJ2LF 73! Marek SQ5BPM