Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55724 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2003 14:48:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netmail00.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.218) by ptb-mailstore with SMTP; 14 Dec 2003 14:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 23947 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2003 14:48:11 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.20) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Dec 2003 14:48:06 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AVXWq-0002yF-UK for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:47:28 +0000 Received: from [152.163.225.97] (helo=imo-r01.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AVXWp-0002xa-Tb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:47:28 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: MarkusVester@aol.com Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id l.1e1.159538fd (4184) for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:46:50 -0500 (EST) From: MarkusVester@aol.com Message-ID: <1e1.159538fd.2d0dd1d9@aol.com> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:46:49 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6104 Subject: LF: TA, CFH qrp?, QRSS Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Dear LF group,

here are some reports on the "slow work":

TA
conditions have been rather favourable recently. Joe VO1NA was visible several mornings on his QRG 137777.07; today before 7:00 even "O" for about 20 minutes (~ -28dBµV/m). No trace from Eric or Laurence was ever received here - but that would have been a miracle anyhow.

CFH qrp?
I have been monitoring CFH levels most nights, the strongest peak I caught was +29dBµV/m on Dec 7th. But their levels are unusually weak now: During the night of Dec 11-12th, CFH disappeared at midnight UT. They reappeared half an hour later, but 5 Hz higher and about 10dB weaker than before. After a second interruption between 01:12 and 01:20, they came back on their original frequency pair (~136959/137039), but have stayed weak since. Can someone possibly confirm that they have actually reduced their radiated power?

PA0SE QRSS
On tonight's overnight scan, there was a line on ~135921 Hz which I attributed to Dick, though with 1-minute averaging I couldn't actually resolve the characters. It peaked ~9dBµV/m (RMS average of dashes and gaps) and ended at 7:50 UT. Browsing back through the captures, I incidentally found a very similar trace on Dec 9/10, 22:30 to 7:50, wandering a bit around 135970.

QRSS activity
Notes on signals logged around 137.7 today:

OK2BVG (+4) dfcw, seen for the first time
IK5ZPV  (+5 dBµV/m, with variable spurious sidebands a couple of Hz away)
DK7FC (+3) dfcw 4Hz shift
S57A (-4)
S52AB (-8)
I5TGC  (-2) chirped Hell

73 and best wishes to all

Markus,
DF6NM in JN59NK