Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10607 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 21:15:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan01.plus.net) (212.159.14.235) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 21:15:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 32560 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 21:15:33 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from ptb-mxcore01.plus.net (212.159.14.215) by ptb-mxscan01.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 21:15:31 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1AXRy7-0008M4-Nd for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:15:31 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AXRxb-0007gH-LA for rs_out@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:14:59 +0000 Received: from [194.25.134.85] (helo=mailout11.sul.t-online.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AXRxa-0007g8-J4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:14:58 +0000 X-Fake-Domain: fwd06.aul.t-online.de Received: from fwd06.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AXRx6-0000NF-04; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:14:28 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: (Gz7v84ZLoe5vUgrFVaVG0XtdBflczXJlsBIKFy4Q+5bmnmCc0zqwwk@[62.224.51.168]) Received: from (Gz7v84ZLoe5vUgrFVaVG0XtdBflczXJlsBIKFy4Q+5bmnmCc0zqwwk@[62.224.51.168]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AXRx4-2Bpssy0; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:14:26 +0100 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c3c655$c4b93de0$fce8c593@rsch15> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1AXRx4-2Bpssy0@fwd06.sul.t-online.com> X-Seen: false X-ID: Gz7v84ZLoe5vUgrFVaVG0XtdBflczXJlsBIKFy4Q+5bmnmCc0zqwwk Subject: Re: LF: RE: CHECK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 1 James Moritz schrieb: > Dear Uwe, LF Group, > > The calculations look OK to me - the results seem to be in line with > other measurements. The ERP calculated from FS measurements is about > 0.8dB below the value calculated from antenna current and Rrad; this is > also normal. I would be interested to know the "environment" of your > antenna, ie. is it in an urban or rural QTH, are there many trees, etc? > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > Dear Jim, tks for the comment. pse see http://www.qsl.net/dj8wx/arrangementofaerials.htm first an second image. Between QTH DJ8WX and QTH RegTP monitoring station (1,7km) where the FS measurements have been made are meadows and pieces of wood (80%wood en toto). Topography: Ground of my aerials 3m above NN (moor) and of the monitoring station 34m above NN (glazial dune sand). meanwhile I updated the site PWR.htm . Best regards Uwe/dj8wx