Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75815 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 12:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netmail02.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.221) by ptb-mailstore with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 12:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 23992 invoked by uid 10001); 3 Dec 2003 12:57:54 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.20) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 12:57:10 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ARWY7-0006FO-S4 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:56:11 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.111] (helo=gadolinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ARWY7-0006FF-FP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:56:11 +0000 Received: from dial81-135-38-33.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.135.38.33] helo=Main) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #25) id 1ARWXM-0007Ed-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:55:25 +0000 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (Main) Message-ID: <000d01c3b99c$b40b9300$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:54:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Spam.....sad... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 2 Hi all, I dont know whether it has occured to anyone else but I find it sad that "Spam" has generated more messages on this reflector recently than LF activity. Where are all the LF users?? Its no use saying you've worked everybody because if the band isnt active then new stations will not be encouraged to try it. Maybe 136 is doomed to the same fate as 73kHz ?? Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com