Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5388 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 16:00:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netmail00.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.218) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 16:00:47 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: (qmail 11967 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 16:00:46 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.20) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 16:00:40 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1AOJ7o-0005AI-V0 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:59:44 +0000 Received: from [65.69.121.158] (helo=willow.nutstreet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1AOJ7o-0005A9-3o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:59:44 +0000 Received: from willow.nutstreet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by willow.nutstreet.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAOFxeAl025648 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:59:40 -0600 Received: from localhost (eric@localhost) by willow.nutstreet.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id hAOFxe9g025644 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:59:40 -0600 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:59:40 -0600 (CST) From: "Eric KD5UWL" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-reply-to: <014401c3b29e$1babb2c0$15309bd2@vaiosn> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: PA0SE Field Srength Meter for 137 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 Ahhh .. excellent. Sorry -- I don't use html email clients for these reflectors and missed the distinction. I did, however, read the )2 as ) ** 2 or )^2 which is what was intended. I just didn't see the difference in the two as written without the benefit of HTML. Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the confusion, Eric On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Stewart Nelson wrote: > Hi Eric and all, > > Dick's post, made with Eudora, contained this HTML fragment: > > The correct formula is:

> P = 0.0111(E *d)2 in which > ... > > Depending on your mail reader and/or browser, the superscript 2 may not > have displayed correctly. > > The correct formula is: P = 0.0111 * (E * d) ** 2 > or P equals 0.0111 times ((E times d) squared) > > Hope this is clear. > > 73, > > Stewart > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric KD5UWL" > To: "LF-Group" > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:44 AM > Subject: Re: LF: PA0SE Field Srength Meter for 137 kHz > > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Dick Rollema wrote: > > > > > produces a certain field strength is wrongly given as > > > P = 0.0111(E * d)2. > > > > > > The correct formula is: > > > > > > P = 0.0111(E *d)2 in which: > > > > Hi, Dick, > > > > Sorry -- I don't see the difference. Did you include the wrong one? > > > > 73 > > Eric > > > > > > > >