Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32572 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 20:00:57 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 20:00:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18212 invoked by uid 10001); 10 Sep 2003 20:00:56 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 20:00:44 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19xB7k-00058O-JO for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:59:32 +0100 Received: from [64.4.23.81] (helo=hotmail.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19xB7e-00057x-OQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:59:26 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: mail Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:58:55 -0700 Received: from 136.226.254.148 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:58:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [136.226.254.148] X-Originating-Email: [hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com] From: "Laurence KL1X" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:58:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2003 19:58:55.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[F6F72FC0:01C377D5] Subject: LF: re DCF39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 1 Transpolar/TranAtlantic conditions to Europe (and the L48 states) from Alaska are still " too early" and we are probably a month before any good or better returns - I hope Im proven wrong. I hope too that the company forgets Im here and I can continue flowing amps until the leaves have fallen and it starts to snow. I think North South Paths are more open, and are "better" overall, and I was hoping to have seen the XDW beacon in Costa Rica but it tripped - I was actually quite confident I would have detected it. If I take DCF39 as a very rough baseline we have only just seen it appear at night time on the 9th Sept for the first time since losing it in Spring, and I can only just detect it at dot 60, we will probably need to get an improvement in propagation paths by some 40-45dBs for Europeans to be seen and maybe heard. Do NOT let this stop you for looking for that DX - as Ive found out strange things happen. Ive never seen CFH yet but I need to spend more time between my morse characters. I dont know about the US East coast from here,and dont have enough empirical measurements to figure when and if Ill see Mitch et al or when they will see me. The Alaska to East Coast US path maybe more difficult than you imagine - the distances to NY and NC are comparable with Europe and still hit the Auroral Zones for most of the time. (Yep I beam NE to get to most of the NE US States). After discussions with Alan and others it looks like signals from Temperate climes into the Equatorial regions (North South and SE/NW so far) are good or better than imagined/envisaged and that only local QRN is the limiting factor. Even so the FFT programs such as Arog/Spectran really do help. There are seasonal factors of course and, as ever, my comments realte from short periods of listening , in the summer, with limited real estate and less than perfect set ups at the remote ends. If there was one things Id do is turn off the AGC especially if your in the tropics! Good luck Gary Laurence KL1X >From: "Gary - G4WGT" >Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >To: >Subject: LF: RE: re DCF39 >Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:38:33 +0100 > >Hi Alan and all at LF, > >Checked CFH last night after Alans comments, looked at captures this >morning >(Wed 10/09/2003)and CFH first seen at about 2300 utc (Tues night)good >strength most of time, some sharp fading later and finally faded out at >about 0625 utc this morning. I will try looking for WD2XDV beacon. > >Using G3LNP loop at 15 feet above ground and Yaesu FT747GX with Spectrum >Lab, my location north west England. > >Regards > >Gary G4WGT > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Alan Melia >Sent: 09 September 2003 09:52 >To: LF-Group >Subject: LF: re DCF39 > > >Hi Steve, yes things are improving a little now, CFH was a good signal here >last night but was a bit "peaky" with some sharp fades. Good levels were >not >present for as long as on your DCF39 plot. Thanks for the gen. > >Cheers de Alan G3NYK >alan.melia@btinternet.com > > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/2003 > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.514 / Virus Database: 312 - Release Date: 28/08/2003 > > _________________________________________________________________ Compare Cable, DSL or Satellite plans: As low as $29.95. https://broadband.msn.com