Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: (qmail 1426 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 05:28:33 -0000
Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221)  by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 05:28:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 312 invoked by uid 10001); 27 Sep 2003 05:28:33 -0000
X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01)
X-Spam-detection-level: 11
Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70)  by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 05:28:24 -0000
X-Fake-Domain: majordom
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1A37Yf-0007Xs-QI for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 06:23:53 +0100
Received: from [212.135.6.10] (helo=smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A37Ya-0007Xj-Jj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 06:23:48 +0100
Received: from tnt-18-193.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.224.193] helo=bryan2) by smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1A37YZ-0006ZJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 06:23:47 +0100
X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (bryan2)
Message-ID: <001001c384b7$82b22360$c1e086d4@bryan2>
From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 06:23:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXTversion=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Rating: 2

Hearing a beacon is nice but it is not communication. Communication requires
that a message be sent and a reply received. Just my view of course.

Bryan - G3GVB
-----Original Message-----
From: hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: 26 September 2003 21:10
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon


>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@charter.net>
>To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:11 AM
>Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon
>
>
>> I in no way associate myself with G3KEV's response to my message.
>>
>> John Andrews, W1TAG
>>
>>
>We both reached the same conclusion. I agree no association please.
>de G3KEV
>
>
>
>