Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22973 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 10:57:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netmail00.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.218) by mailstore with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 10:57:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 18695 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 10:57:37 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail00.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 10:57:30 -0000 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1A2qAL-0008Pb-Fw for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:49:37 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.46] (helo=mta6-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A2q9y-0008PS-F1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:49:14 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: l8p8y6 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.233.12]) by mta6-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20030926104647.BAWB27712.mta6-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:46:47 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (l8p8y6) Message-ID: <000701c38412$e8ef9900$0ce9fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001301c3833b$d8370760$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000801c3836c$85a9a4e0$a2c828c3@erica> <001e01c38371$b3408900$09dc9384@jka> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:43:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Rating: 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Andrews" To: Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re. WD2XDW Beacon > Laurie, > > No offense intended, but other than the correctness of the frequency, is > there anything in that shot that identifies XDW? I cannot make out anything that resembles WD2XDW either, please no guesswork. The real thing or nothing. I often see traces on the forecast frequency but except I get a positive ID then it is not reported. This type of thing has happened in the past and resulted in some suspect QSO'S. Call back tomorrow and the next day for other parts of the callsign!!! Then bingo a claim made for a QSO and please congratulate me!! To be valid the callsign must be seen or heard properly. de Mal/G3KEV > > John Andrews > > >