Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14332 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2003 09:01:25 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 09:01:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7019 invoked by uid 10001); 13 Jul 2003 09:01:25 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2003 09:01:25 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19bcii-00030P-SK for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:00:36 +0100 Received: from [195.22.0.29] (helo=jubilee.esoterica.pt) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19bcie-00030G-V8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:00:33 +0100 Received: from slave-5.esoterica.pt (sjm019.esoterica.pt [195.22.17.147]) by jubilee.esoterica.pt (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6D8fSiH024655; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 09:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030713085537.020e2c60@pop.vianw.pt> X-Sender: NX4YWV@vianw.pt@pop.vianw.pt X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 09:00:37 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Brian Rogerson" Cc: suporte@vianetworks.pt In-reply-to: <000601c3491b$e54eb0b0$1d00a8c0@dellboy> References: <001101c34913$156bd2e0$6507a8c0@Main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: Re: T/A Condx 12/13th July Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi As soon as my "always on" Homepages Server is reconnected I hope to provide an interesting comparison between the morning of the 9th and this morning. 73, Brian CT1DRP At 09:51 13/07/2003, you wrote: >Alan / Joe. > >Yes it look that way, just a vestige of signal at 0040, (presumably at your >dusk?) then nothing all night. > >73 >Dave G3YXM > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Alan Melia" >To: "LF-Group" >Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:47 AM >Subject: LF: T/A Condx 12/13th July > > > > Hi all, It looks as though I was a day too optimistic. According to my >plot > > of CFH last night, conditions had collapsed. Peak CFH levels here were >only > > about 22dBuV. This is about 10dB down on average and about 18dB down on >the > > best over the last week. I think we will now have to go though a "recovery > > period" of about 10 days or more, before levels improve again. > > > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > alan.melia@btinternet.com > > > > > > > > > >