Message-ID: <001e01c346d6$123c6740$6507a8c0@Main>
From: "Alan Melia" <Alan.Melia@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030710092348.00b39100@pop.vianw.pt>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:26:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA July 10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi all, very interesting plots from Brian. The best times will be very
dependent on exact location since the peaks are due I believe to
constructive interference. This could be totally different as little at 30
to 50kms apart. My plot of CFH for 8/9th was better than 7/8th by some
margin, but remember CFH is further away that VO1NA (at least fron UK)
Unfortunately no plot for last night.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Rogerson" <brian@esoterica.pt>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 10 July 2003 10:02
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA July 10


> Dear Joe, Markus, Jim and all,
>
> I was surprised when Jim said that his best reception was on the morning
of
> the 8th as my
> best reception was undoubtedly on the morning of the 9th.  Virtually all
> the transmission was
> at "O" until 05:00utc.  This morning I received only two full call
> signs.  Out of interest I have
> plotted DCF and CFH for 8-9 and 9-10, unfortunately nothing for 7-8 as my
> logging computer
> crashed.  I have included the graph with the Argos of the two full call
> signs which I think were
> received later than those received by Markus.  Certainly there are deep
> nulls for the night
> of 9-10 whereas none for the night of 8-9.  The Argos and graph are on
>
> http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian/VO1NA.htm
>
> Time on Argo utc+1, on graph is utc, sorry the axes are not annotated this
> but was thrown
> together in a hurry.
>
> 73, Brian CT1DRP
>