Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17309 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2003 15:57:54 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 19 Jul 2003 15:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 17175 invoked by uid 10001); 19 Jul 2003 15:57:54 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 2003 15:57:54 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19du4u-00077l-38 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:56:56 +0100 Received: from [212.135.6.12] (helo=smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19du4q-00077Y-7s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:56:52 +0100 Received: from tnt-1-126.easynet.co.uk ([195.40.206.126] helo=captbrian) by smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 19du4o-0003Kt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:56:51 +0100 Message-ID: <000201c34e0e$83ea87c0$7ece28c3@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:53:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: Best 136 Rx? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0tests=NO_DISAPPOINTMENT,ORIGINAL_MESSAGEversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false OK OK OK OK I looked it up. sorry for being lazy, it's more modern than I thought and solid state so more expensive I suspect. Well I like making pre-amps ;-)) and I can use a 706 free, and I have the B41 and I like glowing filaments.... Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Alberto di Bene To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: 19 July 2003 13:35 Subject: Re: LF: Best 136 Rx? >captbrian wrote: > >>Anyone with views on the merits of the IC706 II G vis-a-vis the old TS 850 >>as a 136 Rx. ? >> >>Going to a rally tomorrow - can look out for LF stuff >> >> >> >Bring home a TS850. You won't be disappointed. And if you find the >optional TCXO, >buy it as well. > >Compared to the TS850, the IC706 is stone deaf at 136 kHz and below. >Just MHO (but not only mine). > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > > > >