Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32248 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 17:09:36 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 17:09:36 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 17833 invoked by uid 10001); 11 Jun 2003 17:09:36 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 17:09:35 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Q94O-0006Sy-BA for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:07:32 +0100 Received: from [205.188.157.35] (helo=imo-d03.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Q94K-0006Sp-Bz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:07:28 +0100 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36.3.) id l.72.2ea14029 (3972) for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <72.2ea14029.2c18bbae@aol.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:06:54 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: MMANA--plain text URL? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,NO_REAL_NAMEversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false In a message dated 6/11/03 7:02:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, sn@scgroup.com writes: >> Dick's message was in HTML with an embedded image. His Eudora formatted it correctly, the reflector passed it just fine >> That could very well be the case. AOL said there was an image, yet would not display it...as it has done in the past, even on my primitive version 4.0. :). I would encourage folks to rethink the use of HTML email on the reflector, though. That's one of the biggest security holes on the Internet. Most email clients can be set to not automatically open an attached file (giving you a little extra time to think about it) but not all will give any options about displaying an embedded object except enable HTML/disable HTML. I don't feel comfortable enough to enable it, beyond the very limited capacity of older AOL versions...certainly not in Outlook. Surely most of us remember the worm that spread its way among computers of several members of this group about two years ago? Although I don't believe it was ever spread through the reflector, it was one of those which used an embedded object to start execution of the code. I received copies of it several times in email from the infected computers, but thanks to not having HTML enabled, it caused no harm. A simple file attachment for pictures is still the best solution, in my humble opinion. Regards John