Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10137 invoked from network); 17 May 2003 15:48:28 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 17 May 2003 15:48:28 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: (qmail 8720 invoked by uid 10001); 17 May 2003 15:48:27 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 May 2003 15:48:27 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19H3tw-0006Z6-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 May 2003 16:47:12 +0100 Received: from [194.25.134.83] (helo=mailout07.sul.t-online.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19H3tq-0006Yx-UK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 May 2003 16:47:07 +0100 Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 19H3tq-0001nS-06; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:47:06 +0200 Received: from (0482183881-0001@[62.158.13.49]) by fwd10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 19H3tl-1JKtuaC; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:47:01 +0200 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001801c31ac5$04d12240$6507a8c0@Main> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 17:47:01 +0200 Message-ID: <19H3tl-1JKtuaC@fwd10.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 0482183881-0001@t-dialin.net Subject: Re: LF: re 137.0 last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.0 required=5.0tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, USER_AGENT_TONLINEversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Alan Melia schrieb: > Hi all, I guess this could be a bigger problem over the west side of the > Pond. I saw an FSK signal appear weakly last night at about 2230z, but later > when I decided to switch on the logger, I realised it seemed to have gone > off. Then I saw that there was a wide hump of noise centred on 137 and > assume they switched to GMSK. This has a wider band width than FSK and was > showing at + / - 150Hz even over here. From my previous measurements it > seems to give similar reading but one does need to get is all in the RX > bandwidth. > > I hope the noise is not too wide on that side, and am sorry to see the FCC > refusal after all this time. > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > alan.melia@btinternet.com > > > Hi Alan, were the GMSK/FSK sgns ZOA the last two nights? I did`nt see anything but LORAN-C lines on 137kHz +/- 200Hz. regards Uwe/dj8wx