Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28803 invoked from network); 30 May 2003 23:59:13 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 May 2003 23:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1075 invoked from network); 30 May 2003 23:59:09 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 May 2003 23:59:09 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19LtlB-0005ue-Ts for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 00:58:09 +0100 Received: from [209.225.8.35] (helo=remt25.cluster1.charter.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Ltl7-0005uQ-Hb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 00:58:05 +0100 Received: from [66.189.53.206] (HELO johnupstairs) by remt25.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with SMTP id 44941731; Fri, 30 May 2003 19:57:34 -0400 Message-ID: <000f01c32707$f901b980$0200a8c0@charter.net> From: "John Andrews" To: Lowfer@mailman.qth.net Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 20:02:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Jason speed option? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Responding to an inquiry I made on the Lowfer reflector, Alberto di Bene has indicated that he would look into providing a fast/normal/slow version of Jason if there was sufficient interest. My suggestion had been for the slow option as an aid for U.S. Lowfers who primarily send one-way beacon transmissions. He indicated that there had been some interest from the EU side in a faster speed for 2-way QSOs. Anyone interested in the topic is invited to make their suggestions. John Andrews, W1TAG