Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15323 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 12:57:59 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 12:57:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14078 invoked by uid 10001); 30 Apr 2003 12:57:59 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 12:57:58 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Ar8Z-0005tE-Sq for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:56:39 +0100 Received: from [213.218.75.230] (helo=smtp01.freeler.nl) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Ar8S-0005sr-St for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:56:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 30437 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 12:56:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO w8k3f0.freeler.nl) ([62.21.145.150]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp01.freeler.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Apr 2003 12:56:01 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20030430145410.02a52570@POP3.freeler.nl> X-Sender: FRE0000086604@POP3.freeler.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:55:23 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Dick Rollema" In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20030430120518.00ade070@gemini.herts.ac.uk> References: <006301c30e7e$5e4c4230$1b00a8c0@dellboy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF tuning meter Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.6 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Dear Jim,

Please send me a copy of your paper.

Thanks!

73, Dick, PA0SE

At 12:44 30-4-03 +0100, you wrote:
Dear LF Group,

Thanks for the feedback on the tuning meter. Thanks to G3NYK who has pointed out that the "V" and "A" range switch markings were shown the wrong way round on the circuit diagram - I have corrected that in the most recent version of the file sent out.

It was pointed out that, instead of separate RF volts and current ranges, one could subtract voltage from current, and have a second centre-zero meter showing "R > 50 ohm, R < 50 ohm". I'm sure this would work fine, but I didn't do it because I felt it was more useful to have the separate ranges for diagnostic purposes - so you can see directly if there is any output voltage from the TX, whether the load is drawing any current, measure power, etc. Having the scales set so that equal meter deflections are obtained with the correct load resistance is almost as convenient - you don't need to adjust the loading as often as you adjust the resonant frequency.

The meter could be used unmodified in a 75ohm system, the only difference would be that there would not be equal deflections on V and A scales with a matched load. Of course, if you have a 75 ohm system, the ranges can be altered so that the FSD of the V scale is 75 times that of the A scale.

The phase detector output could be used to drive a servo tuning motor for an automatic tuning system. It would be a good idea to RF low-pass filter the DC output from the detector if you wanted to do this.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU