Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8344 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 11:45:24 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 11:45:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 22314 invoked by uid 10001); 30 Apr 2003 11:45:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 11:45:24 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Aq0n-0005Nv-66 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:33 +0100 Received: from [147.197.200.9] (helo=hestia.herts.ac.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Aq0h-0005Nm-Bx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:27 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 19Aq0X-0000BV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:17 +0100 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19Aq0M-0004DM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:06 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20030430120518.00ade070@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:04 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" In-reply-to: <006301c30e7e$5e4c4230$1b00a8c0@dellboy> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: LF: Re: LF tuning meter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TOversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dear LF Group, Thanks for the feedback on the tuning meter. Thanks to G3NYK who has pointed out that the "V" and "A" range switch markings were shown the wrong way round on the circuit diagram - I have corrected that in the most recent version of the file sent out. It was pointed out that, instead of separate RF volts and current ranges, one could subtract voltage from current, and have a second centre-zero meter showing "R > 50 ohm, R < 50 ohm". I'm sure this would work fine, but I didn't do it because I felt it was more useful to have the separate ranges for diagnostic purposes - so you can see directly if there is any output voltage from the TX, whether the load is drawing any current, measure power, etc. Having the scales set so that equal meter deflections are obtained with the correct load resistance is almost as convenient - you don't need to adjust the loading as often as you adjust the resonant frequency. The meter could be used unmodified in a 75ohm system, the only difference would be that there would not be equal deflections on V and A scales with a matched load. Of course, if you have a 75 ohm system, the ranges can be altered so that the FSD of the V scale is 75 times that of the A scale. The phase detector output could be used to drive a servo tuning motor for an automatic tuning system. It would be a good idea to RF low-pass filter the DC output from the detector if you wanted to do this. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU