Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7333 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 16:14:57 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 16:14:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 27979 invoked by uid 10001); 21 Apr 2003 16:14:56 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 16:14:56 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 197dt3-0001E5-AT for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:11:21 +0100 Received: from [165.212.11.112] (helo=cmsrelay03.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 197dsr-0001Dw-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:11:09 +0100 Received: from uadvg131.cms.usa.net (HELO localhost) (165.212.11.131) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 16:10:35 -0000 Received: from usa.net [213.217.182.7] by uadvg131.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.2.05) with ESMTP id 724HDuqkh0254M31; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:10:34 GMT Message-ID: <3EA417F4.5050105@usa.net> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:10:28 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <19a.13b7b1e1.2bd4dad9@aol.com> Subject: LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.9 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false WarmSpgs@aol.com wrote: >A couple of things I did find amusing on the EH home page, however, are >statements such as: "For more than 120 years all antennas have been Hertz >antennas, except the Crossed Field Antenna." (I wonder how Signor Marconi >feels about that?) > >And: "In the future all antennas will be EH Antennas. How can this bold >statement have any basis in fact?" (Simplest answer: it can't have, unless >we sneak into all homes, offices, and libraries around the world and change >the dictionary definition of "basis" or "fact," or perhaps "antennas.") >[...] > > John, ROTFL !! It's incredible how every now and then, self-taught men raise their heads and declare Einstein's Relativity invalid (see the series of Ivor Catt mails about fifteen years ago to Wireless World), or reinvent once more the perpetual motion, or the CFA/EH antennas. But we need those jokers, otherwise life would be so dull ! 73 Alberto I2PHD