Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8781 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 08:48:24 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 08:48:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 12677 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2003 08:41:31 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Apr 2003 08:41:31 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 197Wr6-0007cK-7M for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:40:52 +0100 Received: from [64.12.136.5] (helo=imo-m02.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 197Wr1-0007cB-A8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:40:47 +0100 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.22.) id l.1a5.12b43bb6 (4246) for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 04:40:12 -0400 (EDT) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: <1a5.12b43bb6.2bd5086c@aol.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 04:40:12 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 50 Subject: LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0tests=HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_LONG_LINE_QP,NO_REAL_NAMEversion=2.53 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi John,

Fantastic ! The addendum puts a bright light on all this EH-CFA-hype/nonsense which can be seen in a lot of places (even in a german radio amateur mag).


About your addendum (which IMO is not off-topic, see below):

With you being a great humanitarian, how about a special bargain price for the members of this reflector, at least while your patent rights for Air, Air II (tm), etc are still pending ?

Reason: I have the bad feeling that my (conventional non-EH) LF antenna produces lots of the smelly derivative of phlogiston under certain conditions [a mix of Oh-Three(tm) and Enn-Oh-Two(tm)], so maybe I have already infringed the patents of your phenomenal invention - whithout knowing about it. Ashes over my head, and I promise never to do it again.

Happy easter and thanks again,
 Wolf