Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4444 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 18:39:35 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 18:39:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 8109 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 18:39:23 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 18:39:23 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 193gto-0003Kg-SF for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:35:48 +0100 Received: from [195.92.195.174] (helo=cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 193gtj-0003KX-AW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:35:43 +0100 Received: from modem-22.oregon.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.88.22] helo=f3a3a2) by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 193gth-00042s-In for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:35:41 +0100 Message-ID: <000d01c2ff90$1a3a5840$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> From: "Laurie Mayhead" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001601c2ff6f$156fdae0$9cccfc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:34:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: CE Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
----- Original Message -----
From: hamilton mal
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: LF: CE

Hi all
On QRS mode CQ takes up a lot of non productive time. I am going to try instead CE which is unique and does not clash with any other bit of amateur procedure. ie CE G3KEV K
Those that see me using the above procedure on QRS mode will know that I am calling CQ  and can respond accordingly.
If anyone has an opinion on the above for or against pse comment. On normal CW I wll continue with the established CQ.
73 de G3KEV/IO94SH
Why not GE which could stand for general enquiry and is one dot shorter.! Laurie