Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10364 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 20:39:59 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 20:39:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26911 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 20:39:47 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 20:39:47 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1945IR-0004Di-EU for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:38:51 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.41] (helo=mta1-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1945IF-0004DZ-H9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:38:39 +0100 Received: from ian ([62.252.206.18]) by mta1-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030411203833.ORLA6822.mta1-svc.business.ntl.com@ian> for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:38:33 +0100 Message-ID: <000b01c30062$111fd640$12cefc3e@ian> From: "Ian Kyle" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:11:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Experimentation. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi all, things seem to have been pretty quiet on the reflector this week, which has given me the chance to go "back to basics". (Didn't some daft political party witter on about that and get roundly trounced a couple of elections ago?) Never mind, the case of the disappearing antenna current has been the subject of much agonising and brain-bashing this week and I am happy to say that some of the anomalies have been found to be more apparent than real. Having got Madame out of the way for a guzzle, gurgle and gossip session with one of her pals I obtained unrestricted access to the microwave oven and conducted a number of tests on the materials used in my various erections (if you'll pardon the expression). The conclusions are that the lighter and cheaper the plywood, the greater the losses. Samples of the good quality material used for the endplates and ribs of the big coil barely warmed at 850W, as did the hardwood dowel. But the cheap, thin plywood used for the 'dogbox' got fairly hot by the time the coffee water boiled. However, allowing for the differences in frequency, power levels and spacing involved, only a small proportion of the vanishing amps could be accounted for by this alone. Cutting a long and exasperating story short, once the test gear had been checked out and found wanting in certain respects (I had completely forgotten that it had been built and calibrated for 73 KHz using toroids of dubious origin and was more than a bit out at 136KHz); a number of alterations made to the 'angle of dangle' of the vertical wires and their attack angle to the coil; a reworking of the antenna current sensor placement; and the discovery of a puzzling anomaly - still to be resolved - in the earthing arrangements, it would appear that now 205W at 73KHz and 100W at 136KHz each put about 75% more current into the antenna. Neither the position of the coil relative to cement block and/or brick walls better than 1/2 coil diameter away, or its height (checked at intervals up to better than coil length) above a concrete path made seemed to make any appreciable difference. This is a very worthwhile improvement and encourages me to continue with T/A beaconing on 136KHz, but only more or better reports and QSOs will show whether the increase is more real than apparent. Volunteers for skeds on both bands would be welcome. The only thing I can say for certain out of all this is that coffee is better for cerebration than Merlot, but for relaxation it's the other way round! 73 de, Ian GI8AYZ/MI0AYZ