Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22509 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 18:40:02 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 18:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 18795 invoked by uid 10001); 6 Mar 2003 18:40:01 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 18:40:01 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18r0HM-0007eS-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:39:40 +0000 Received: from [130.244.199.132] (helo=fep04-svc.swip.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18r0HH-0007eJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:39:36 +0000 Received: from kent1 ([213.101.101.81]) by fep04-svc.swip.net with SMTP id <20030306183933.UREM24060.fep04-svc.swip.net@kent1> for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:39:33 +0100 From: "Kent Svensson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:39:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <002b01c2e40f$5fcb0c20$1b00a8c0@dellboy> Subject: LF: unsuscribe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.2 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXTversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]För Dave Pick Skickat: den 6 mars 2003 19:37 Till: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Ämne: LF: Re: Re: LF broadband QRN? Geri. It's already trialling in Crieff and Campeltown (central Scotland). I don't think it'll be radiating as far as John's QTH though! My ADSL via telephone wires causes no problem on any band. If there are 50 or 100Hz components it's most likely a PSU. http://www.hydro.co.uk/broadband/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2754203.stm Dave G3YXM > Hello John, > > in a computer-magazine saw a new kind of cable-less modems that work through > the regular power line. No idea on which frequencies those devices operate, > hopefully not on 73 or 136 kHz! > > Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John W Gould" > To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group@Blacksheep.Org" > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:02 PM > Subject: LF: LF broadband QRN? > > > > > > Since the 73kHz tests on Tuesday I have been monitoring at several times a > > day and find a consistent and steady noise-level that is about 20dB below > > the signal at 138.8kHz, and about 6dB below the one at 75kHz. Its a mains > > type of buzz, beating at times with itself. Like most I have had this in > > the past and put it down to RFI from switched-mode PSUs, however, it was > > only sporadic in the past so I am wondering if it's something new. It > seems > > to be all the way up the LF band to just below the LW broadcast band (but > > that cut-off could be a function of my aerial's resonance set at 73kHz). > > > > The only thoughts that I have is ADSL or signalling on the HV underground > > cable somewhere beneath my garden. Certainly, ADSL will have become much > > more used locally since I last did an serious listening on LF, but I would > > have thought the radiation would be fairly low from the balanced overhead > > telephone lines that are at least 200m from my aerial. I would have > thought > > that the shielding around underground HV mains cables would be sufficient > to > > stop low-level signaling causing problems. > > > > I can't see a real reason why TV related interfernce should increase near > to > > my home. How far away do TV's etc need to be before they cause problems, > or > > is it more caused by the interference conducting itself along the mains > > cabling, etc. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > > > > > >