Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16150 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 07:16:50 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 07:16:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 27082 invoked by uid 10001); 4 Mar 2003 07:16:50 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 07:16:50 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18q6bJ-0002Z8-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:12:33 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.147] (helo=einsteinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18q6bD-0002Yz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:12:27 +0000 Received: from host213-122-137-181.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.137.181] helo=presario-1920) by einsteinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 18q6bC-0002bC-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:12:27 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:13:28 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <006d01c2e19d$a8b2f250$1b00a8c0@dellboy> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: RE: Re: 73kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.2 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXTversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false All, I'll tentatively say that I will operate from about on 72.200kHz, though I suppose if I cause QRM I can count it as success! It will be a manual changeover from TX to RX. Won't be on the Internet whilst tests are on-going as no local-loop to the garden shed! Will have my mobile (pop me an e-mail if you need the number). Dick, I won't be attempting QRSS today but would be interested in an reception reports of signals around 72.2kHz 73 John, G3WKL > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Dave Pick > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 15:07 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Re: 73kHz > > > Mike and all. > > The pancake-day tests. > I'll use 71.950 TX. > Listening co-channel (noise permitting) and 136.7 for CW, 137.720 > for QRSS3. > I will call for CW on the hour (xx00) and for QRSS3 on the > half-hour (xx30) > Starting 0900. > Finishing when something catches fire or nobody comes back! > > 73 > Dave > G3YXM. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Dennison" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:17 PM > Subject: LF: 73kHz > > > > I am now set up on 73kHz and have 1A into the antenna. I will > beacon this > > evening 1800-1900 in case anyone wants to check their receivers. > > > > Tomorrow, Tuesday, I will call CQ on 71.750kHz on the following > schedule: > > > > 0900 CW QSX 71.750, 136.900 > > 0930 CW QSX 71.750, 136.900 > > 1000 QRSS3 QSX 71.750, 136.900 (for CW calls) > > 1030 QRSS3 QSX 71.750, 137.700 (for QRSS3) > > 1100 CW QSX 71.750, 136.900 > > 1130 QRSS10 QSX 71.750, 137.700 (for QRSS3) > > > > 1800 QRSS3 QSX 71.750, 136.900 (for CW calls) > > 1830 QRSS3 QSX 71.750, 137.700 (for QRSS3) > > 1930 QRSS10 QSX 71.750, 137.700 (for QRSS3) > > > > When replying on 136kHz please allow a few seconds for coil changing. My > > signal is likely to be much weaker than G3YXM, but my QRSS3 has been > > received as far away as DL, HB and I in previous years. > > > > Mike, G3XDV > > http://www.lf.thersgb.net > > ==================== > > > > > > > > > > > >