Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27706 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 22:54:40 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 22:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 3867 invoked by uid 10001); 24 Mar 2003 22:54:40 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 22:54:40 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18xapI-0004PW-PP for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:53:56 +0000 Received: from [207.217.120.188] (helo=stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 18xapD-0004PN-W5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:53:52 +0000 Received: from ip68-98-177-130.nv.nv.cox.net ([68.98.177.130] helo=Larsen.mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18xapC-0006zR-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:53:50 -0800 Message-ID: <5.2.0.9.0.20030324175015.0272cec0@pop.mindspring.com> X-Sender: fgentges@mindspring.com@pop.mindspring.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:54:58 -0500 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Frank_Gentges_K=D8BRA?= In-reply-to: <3E7F893F.3050506@usa.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace: 94f6b436fe9ff56f9c7f779228e2f6aeda0071232e20db4dfd2da3e77c3340b75f35574a9f150457350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: LF: Receiver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.5 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi, I have similar good experience with the NRD-525. My only comment is that the display and microprocessor can generate some false signals which are down near the noise threshold aurally but can show up more in the narrowband displays like Argo and sound like brain dead CW. A good active antenna will cover up those signals. Frank K0BRA At 11:39 PM 3/24/03 +0100, Alberto di Bene wrote: >Steve Dove wrote: > >>Hi Alberto, >> >>The fuzziness that is my memory vaguely remembers you once saying that >>you were using a JRC receiver, which you really liked. Is this so, and >>which model? >> >Hi Steve, > it is the JRC NRD-525, which is also quite stable, having a TCXO > factory-installed. >Also the sensitivity on the LF is very good, at a par with the TS-850 I >had a couple >of years ago. >As some reviewers of digital cameras would say, ** recommended ** :-) > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > Frank Gentges KØBRA LF web site at