Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20332 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2003 14:33:43 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 14:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 18305 invoked by uid 10001); 31 Mar 2003 14:33:41 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 14:33:40 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1900Kw-0005IH-AE for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:32:34 +0100 Received: from [165.212.11.2] (helo=cmsrelay05.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.14) id 1900Kp-0005I8-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:32:27 +0100 Received: from uadvg130.cms.usa.net (HELO localhost) (165.212.11.130) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 14:32:18 -0000 Received: from usa.net [213.217.171.133] by uadvg130.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.2.05) with ESMTP id 273HcEoGq0077M30; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:32:16 GMT Message-ID: <3E885164.2020700@usa.net> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:32:04 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01C2F795.EDC2A760.g4jnt@thersgb.net> Subject: LF: RE: LF and apple juice Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.9 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UAversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Andy talbot wrote: >Shouldn't we be concerned about that report? It suggests there are effects of >RF on biological tissue other than heating, and if the public got to hear of >these findings there could be yet more uninformed paranoia about RF safety >issues. > A few months ago, I started a rumor among my friends (those not too much versed in electronic and physics at least...). I started saying that microwave ovens are dangerous, as some part of the "radiation" that eats up the foods can remain inside them even after the oven is switched off, and this can be potentially dangerous to the health..... I am monitoring how much time it will pass until this "alert" will reach the press or even the TV... :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD