Return-Path: Received: (qmail 857 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 12:55:33 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 12:55:33 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 19692 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 12:55:25 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 12:55:25 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 18xnws-0008F9-4c for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:54:38 +0000 Received: from [204.60.203.69] (helo=mta3.snet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 18xnwi-0008Eu-GU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:54:28 +0000 Received: from snet.net (23.212.252.64.snet.net [64.252.212.23]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-smtp-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with ESMTP id h2PCsLQV027980 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:54:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E8051CF.F60DAFAB@snet.net> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:55:44 -0500 From: "Jay Rusgrove" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3E80324C.1020009@usa.net> <001301c2f2c6$9154dee0$0500a8c0@charter.net> <000801c2f2ca$2db753a0$cc28730a@direcpc.com> Subject: Re: LF: Re: TA 25 March Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.8 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Similar results here. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD lloyd chastant wrote: > My overnites showed only light traces at 137.77215 and 137.7742 at about > 0530z and another light trace at 137.7745 at 0815z..nothing that was easily > identified... > de Lloyd W3NF FM19MH > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Andrews" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:03 AM > Subject: LF: TA 25 March > > > No luck again today, mostly because the FTP process failed at 0545, and no > > captures were saved after that point. There were some hints of a signal at > > 137774.2 just before things died. > > > > I also have a signal at 137772.2 as of 1145, which I assume is "MP," > though > > I can't ID it. > > > > John Andrews, W1TAG > > > >