Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16884 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:39:52 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:39:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 13570 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:39:54 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:39:53 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18qCdC-00047P-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 13:38:54 +0000 Received: from [204.60.203.69] (helo=mta3.snet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18qCd0-000479-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 13:38:42 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [204.60.199.7] X-SBCIS-MTA: [mta3.snet.net] Received: from snet.net (ptnm-sh9-port7.snet.net [204.60.199.7]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SNET-mx-1.2/D-1.1.1.1/O-1.1.1.1) with ESMTP id h24Dcdta005134 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:38:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E64AC6C.6F6186E4@snet.net> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:38:53 -0500 From: "Jay Rusgrove" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Subject: Re: LF: TA 4 March Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.8 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Joe Nice quiet night here...loran line strong and clean. Not a trace of any other signals. Maybe "the usuals" had their stations geared up for 72 kHz operations this morning? Jay Joe Craig wrote: > And here. I even did a continuity check of the coax to the loop > to make sure the loop was still there. > > Joe VO1NA > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Jay Rusgrove wrote: > > > Same here. > > > > Jay Rusgrove, W1VD > > > > John Andrews wrote: > > > > > Nothing. > > > > > > John Andrews > > > >