Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24083 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 23:14:15 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 23:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3215 invoked by uid 10001); 11 Mar 2003 23:14:15 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 23:14:14 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18ssva-0006va-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:12:58 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.176] (helo=protactinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18ssvW-0006vR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:12:54 +0000 Received: from host217-34-95-109.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.34.95.109] helo=dellboy) by protactinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 18ssvW-0007ZC-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:12:54 +0000 Message-ID: <00b401c2e823$e6135040$1b00a8c0@dellboy> From: "Dave Pick" To: "LF Group" Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:13:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: UA9 and T/A beacons Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGEversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Dear all.

Might I suggest that we hold off the T/A beacon tests until the suggested 0500 onward window whilst the UA9 expedition is on the air? It's going to be impossible to copy them if we beacon so close to their frequency of 137.700.

Dave G3YXM.