Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2734 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2003 10:13:23 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 10:13:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 11277 invoked by uid 10001); 14 Mar 2003 10:13:23 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 Mar 2003 10:13:23 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tmBH-0004Io-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:12:51 +0000 Received: from [212.135.6.13] (helo=smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tmB9-0004Ib-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:12:43 +0000 Received: from tnt-21-227.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.228.227] helo=erica) by smarthost3.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 18tmB8-000IZx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:12:43 +0000 Message-ID: <000a01c2ea12$d8880920$e3e486d4@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c2ea04$218db8e0$d5ce28c3@erica> <000601c2ea09$8251cf40$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:16:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: UA9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Mike > > What speed was this? I had a QRSS30 screen running (as well as the QRSS120) > and saw what could have been UA9OC sending QRSS10 at 0.15Hz HF of nominal, > at midnight. The wrong speed screen makes it unreadable, but it certainly > looks like it could be "UA9OC K". Someone appears to be calling him just > afterwards. > My screen was set to 10dot normal. This is my compromise setting for anything that might appear from 3sec to 30secs. At the time I wasn't looking. The Argo screen was behind my Word screen as I was typing in the Antennas column, which is running a bit late. I switched off Word and saw the callsign as shown. By the time I had got around to capturing it I had missed out the U. After he signed I gave a call - just my call sign (10 sec dots) in case he was looking - sorry about the mess. After I signed I carried on looking and he came on again but the signal/noise didn't allow a further ID. I would say that it certainly was UA9OC that you saw. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web