Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13021 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 20:16:19 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 20:16:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 18026 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 20:16:20 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 20:16:20 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18r1lW-00082i-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:14:54 +0000 Received: from [212.227.126.185] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18r1lR-00082S-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:14:49 +0000 Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18r1lR-0006rw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:14:49 +0100 Received: from [217.86.77.70] (helo=W1KW) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18r1lQ-0008Rw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 21:14:48 +0100 Message-ID: <000a01c2e41c$ff227260$fe78a8c0@W1KW> From: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002001c2e406$441ea170$fe78a8c0@W1KW> <002b01c2e40f$5fcb0c20$1b00a8c0@dellboy> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:14:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: LF broadband QRN? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Dave, I am not talking about poweline communication as such, but the devices I saw were kind of small powerline LAN modems for point-to-point communication within houses, and I am sure those can be pretty nasty if they are getting popular ... Vy 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Pick" To: Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:36 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: LF broadband QRN? > > Geri. > > It's already trialling in Crieff and Campeltown (central Scotland). I don't > think it'll be radiating as far as John's QTH though! > My ADSL via telephone wires causes no problem on any band. > If there are 50 or 100Hz components it's most likely a PSU. > > http://www.hydro.co.uk/broadband/ > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2754203.stm > > Dave > G3YXM > > > > > > Hello John, > > > > in a computer-magazine saw a new kind of cable-less modems that work > through > > the regular power line. No idea on which frequencies those devices > operate, > > hopefully not on 73 or 136 kHz! > > > > Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "John W Gould" > > To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group@Blacksheep.Org" > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:02 PM > > Subject: LF: LF broadband QRN? > > > > > > > > > > Since the 73kHz tests on Tuesday I have been monitoring at several times > a > > > day and find a consistent and steady noise-level that is about 20dB > below > > > the signal at 138.8kHz, and about 6dB below the one at 75kHz. Its a > mains > > > type of buzz, beating at times with itself. Like most I have had this > in > > > the past and put it down to RFI from switched-mode PSUs, however, it was > > > only sporadic in the past so I am wondering if it's something new. It > > seems > > > to be all the way up the LF band to just below the LW broadcast band > (but > > > that cut-off could be a function of my aerial's resonance set at 73kHz). > > > > > > The only thoughts that I have is ADSL or signalling on the HV > underground > > > cable somewhere beneath my garden. Certainly, ADSL will have become much > > > more used locally since I last did an serious listening on LF, but I > would > > > have thought the radiation would be fairly low from the balanced > overhead > > > telephone lines that are at least 200m from my aerial. I would have > > thought > > > that the shielding around underground HV mains cables would be > sufficient > > to > > > stop low-level signaling causing problems. > > > > > > I can't see a real reason why TV related interfernce should increase > near > > to > > > my home. How far away do TV's etc need to be before they cause > problems, > > or > > > is it more caused by the interference conducting itself along the mains > > > cabling, etc. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >