Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32298 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 00:29:17 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 00:29:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5938 invoked by uid 10001); 5 Mar 2003 00:29:17 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 00:29:17 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18qMll-00070X-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:28:25 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.147] (helo=einsteinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18qMlg-00070O-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:28:20 +0000 Received: from host213-122-41-6.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.41.6] helo=Main) by einsteinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 18qMlf-000455-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:28:20 +0000 Message-ID: <000901c2e2ae$28251160$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:24:03 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: 73kHz Web Waterfall on 4th Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi all, well I had an interesting morning watching the 73k stations, and hearing the best S/N hand speed CW I ever heard on 73kHz..... when there was no TV PSU problems. It would seem that there were about 46 waterfall frames downloaded, so someone is using it... even if they are not admitting it. I will run it in future on 136kHz mainly at weekend mornings in future unless there is a burst of activity on a weekday, or someone requests it to be set running for a test (even on 73 k ??!!) Alternatively ARGO screens can be uploaded at greater sensitivity for weak signal tests, again on request. Argo might be better for the next 73k "majik-day" in April, as a relatively small range of frequencies are used. Thanks for the fun Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com