Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9313 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 07:48:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 07:48:29 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 7904 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 07:48:31 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 07:48:31 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18ofBj-0001uR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:44:11 +0000 Received: from [194.217.242.85] (helo=anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18ofBd-0001uI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:44:05 +0000 Received: from telemetry.demon.co.uk ([194.222.19.114]) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 18ofBc-0001L6-0Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:44:05 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:27:36 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Tom Boucher" References: <001c01c2dec6$044de5a0$6507a8c0@Main> In-reply-to: <001c01c2dec6$044de5a0$6507a8c0@Main> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Subject: Re: LF: O/C chasing at LF X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I wondered who owned the S9+20 signal Alan! 73, Tom G3OLB In message <001c01c2dec6$044de5a0$6507a8c0@Main>, Alan Melia writes >Hi all, I thought this little episode might prove interesting and it >certainly finds a use for the "below 50MHz" part of a hand-held scanner. I >have an AOR 2700 which purports to operate down to 100kHz, but like a lot of >this kind of kit is very deaf down there. I did think it might be useful for >DFing TV interfence, but it is too deaf even for that, without a pre-amp. > >I restrung my 60m-top Marconi last weekend and was disappointed to see that >the tunning when paralleled with my 30m top inv-L was not at the original >position. As it is a receive aerial is is strung with 1mm PVC coated wire. A >quick measurement of the tuning inductor indicated only 80pF more capacity, >which I guessed would mean a break inside the insulation about 16m from the >feed point (5pF / m). After a little thought and a couple of coffees, I >plugged the end of the unloaded 60m wire into the 600ohm output of the PS-12 >(W&G SIG GEN) turned up full and with the interenal resistor set to "0". I >then walked down the wire (now dropped to the ground again), running the >wire at right-angles over the closed telescopic aerial on the AOR2700. The >"S-meter" gave fullscale on AM, and about 15m down the wire it dropped >significantly ( to "S3"). A quick waggle of the wire confirmed two breaks at >that point. I was quite pleasantly surprised that point indicated by the >scanner s-meter was with an inch of the break. After a quick soldering job >and a tape-up the aerial tuning inductor was back to where it was expected >to be. > >I know its not rocket science but its nice when these little tricks really >work. The feed voltage from the PS-12 was about 0.7V r.m.s. It also proved >my contention that a wide coverage receiver is one of the most useful bits >of test gear you can have (I might add "portable" to that as well now!!) > >Cheers de Alan G3NYK >alan.melia@btinternet.com > > > > -- Tom Boucher 'Hedgerows' Sheldon Honiton Devon EX14 4QS