Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3413 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 22:41:56 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 22:41:56 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 23084 invoked by uid 10001); 19 Feb 2003 22:41:45 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 22:41:45 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18lctY-0007q2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:40:52 +0000 Received: from [24.153.64.2] (helo=smtp.comcast.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18lctY-0007ps-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:40:52 +0000 Received: from Charlie_Drake (pcp01445904pcs.lebnon01.pa.comcast.net [68.83.65.211]) by mtaout07.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.09 (built Jan 7 2003)) with SMTP id <0HAK00F71UX79C@mtaout07.icomcast.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:39:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:39:09 -0500 From: "Steve Dove" In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030219220155.00b2dec0@pop.sapo.pt> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: Organization: d s p MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 6.04 build 1135 X-Priority: 3 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=6.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,INVALID_MSGID,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false You've been got. Thought it was you! Well done! 2/19/2003 5:03:42 PM, Brian Rogerson wrote: >Hi All > >I'm transmitting at the moment and hope that is on 137773.4Hz > >Brian CT1DRP > > > > > >At 21:48 19/02/2003, you wrote: >>Hi Peter, >> >>John's right. My display was 0.05Hz (egads!) low last night. The Loran >>line (top one on my display) should be sitting at '774.03. >> >> All the best, >> >> Steve >> >> >>2/19/2003 4:44:51 PM, "John Andrews" wrote: >> >> >Peter, >> > >> >The Loran line that shows at 774.03 on my screen shots is at its calculated >> >frequency, so the other readings from those shots should be pretty exact. >> > >> >John Andrews >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >