Return-Path: Received: (qmail 567 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 21:50:37 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 21:50:37 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 10931 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 21:50:39 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 21:50:39 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18lc5k-0007RJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:49:24 +0000 Received: from [24.153.64.2] (helo=smtp.comcast.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18lc5k-0007RA-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:49:24 +0000 Received: from Charlie_Drake (pcp01445904pcs.lebnon01.pa.comcast.net [68.83.65.211]) by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.09 (built Jan 7 2003)) with SMTP id <0HAK00HM5SLHHB@mtaout02.icomcast.net> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:48:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:48:53 -0500 From: "Steve Dove" In-reply-to: <007001c2d860$227ef1c0$09dc9384@jka> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: Organization: d s p MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Opera 6.04 build 1135 X-Priority: 3 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Frequency accuracy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=6.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,INVALID_MSGID,IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Peter, John's right. My display was 0.05Hz (egads!) low last night. The Loran line (top one on my display) should be sitting at '774.03. All the best, Steve 2/19/2003 4:44:51 PM, "John Andrews" wrote: >Peter, > >The Loran line that shows at 774.03 on my screen shots is at its calculated >frequency, so the other readings from those shots should be pretty exact. > >John Andrews > > > > >