content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:04:32 +0100
Message-ID: <2D280BB697C7EE4C979C5C89925418EFB05AB8@TNS-FBU-2E-003.corp.telenor.no>
Thread-Topic: Re: RE: Re: R: I5TGC
Thread-Index: AcLJTxvucGG/S4qLQJavIDIdTxip6wC5QwKg
From: jan-martin.noding@telenor.com
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: R: I5TGC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

...........and it is a programto minimize the files - mainly for use on internet 
- where you decide how readable you want the picture to be, too many sends very 
large file sizes, when the size could have been a small fraction with perfectly 
satisfactory quality. Such may not be satisfactory for publications, but one may 
wonder if some of the picture G3LDO presented in last issue of radcom should 
still have been redrawn to be published in the magazine

73
Jan-Martin

---
J M Nøding, Datakvalitet, TTS, Kristiansand
http://tts.telenor.no/orginfo.html?filterstructureid=13&parent=86&treetopid=86
Telefon 0047-380-52660, 9077-7126 (QTH: 0047-380-87178)


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pick [mailto:g3yxm@wireless.org.uk]
Sent: 31. januar 2003 18:31
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: R: I5TGC


gifs are smaller for areas of solid colour, like diagrams. Jpegs are smaller
for photos.

Dave G3YXM
----- Original Message -----
From: <jan-martin.noding@telenor.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Cc: <la8ak@online.no>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: LF: RE: Re: R: I5TGC


well,

gif type files are smaller, don't really understand why it should be jpg?

73,
Jan-Martin
---
J M Nøding, Kristiansand


-----Original Message-----
From: g3ldo [mailto:g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk]
Sent: 31. januar 2003 16:11
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: R: I5TGC


Hello Cesare

I write a column each month for the RSGB magazine, RadCom, called
'Antennas'.  I often get letters from readers who ask 'what is the best
commercial antenna to use if you have only a small garden or no garden at
all and talk about the impossability of operating on the lower frequency
bands from such a QTH.
I would like to describe your lower frequency antennas as an example of what
can be done to overcome these difficulties.
I would like to use the description from your web page (or any other
information that you might have). Do you have some higher resolution images
that could be used. In general a .JPG image needs to be over 100k in size to
be reproduced in a magazine.

Many thanks


Peter, G3LDO

e-mail <g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk>

Web <http://web.ukonline.co.uk/g3ldo>