Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29162 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 18:11:49 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 18:11:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 20151 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 18:11:35 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 18:11:34 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18jNof-0000fn-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:10:33 +0000 Received: from [64.12.136.164] (helo=imo-m09.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18jNod-0000fe-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:10:31 +0000 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id l.1ee.1cfb5f1 (4362) for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:40 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <1ee.1cfb5f1.2b7d3963@aol.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:39 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: EH-Antenna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=6.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false In a message dated 2/13/03 9:46:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bernd.Grupe@t-online.de writes: << If the loss of efficiency will be abt. 10dB compared to a fullsize-dipol(measured at 1.8MHz!) then it would be a hope for all lowfers with large aereas and tolerant neighborhood :-) >> I suppose it would, but we should remember that the comparison was not made against a full size dipole. It was made against an electrically short vertical, which would already be many dB down from a full size dipole. So far there is still no data anywhere in the world showing an EH antenna or a CFA actually producing the same field strength as a properly working quarter wave vertical or a full size dipole... let alone the greater efficiencies claimed by their inventors. 73 John Davis